Showing posts with label transparency. Show all posts
Showing posts with label transparency. Show all posts

Monday, January 12, 2015

Professional management helps mutual fund investors from various risks

My article in Mid-day Mumbai (Gujarati) edition today:

http://epaper.gujaratimidday.com//epaperpdf/gmd/12012015/12012015-md-gm-12.pdf

The English translation is as under:

As we know, a mutual fund is a vehicle through which an investor can invest into various investment options. By putting money into a mutual fund, an investor hires the services of a professional fund manager. We hire the services of a professional manager in many walks of our life, e.g. hiring a lawyer to fight a legal case, hiring an accountant to write books of accounts, hiring a travel agency to arrange a vacation. One can do many of these things oneself, but still many times hiring a professional is a better choice. While a business owner may have great knowledge of accounting, one still hires the services of an accountant so that she may concentrate on the broader aspects of managing her business. Same thing applies to managing your money also.
The underlying principle behind the above scenarios is the same: Do what you know the best. Hire smart people for the rest.
A professional fund manager offers expertise in selection of securities after careful analysis of various aspects of the economy, the industry, the company, the security, etc. While you do what you are best at and what you love to do, the fund manager spends most of the time in this business of managing other people’s money. Thus, investment through mutual funds offers us the ability to benefit from full time use of the expertise of a fund manager.
Investment is a risky business. Some risks need to be avoided but some of the other risks need to be understood and carefully managed. It is the management of such risks where the expertise of a good fund manager comes in the play.
A good fund manager stays away from making some of the common mistakes made by investors at large. Which are these mistakes?
1.     Investing in too many stocks – too much diversification
2.     Investing in too few stocks – high degree of concentration
3.     Investing across various related businesses
4.     Not having an investment plan or policy
5.     Not sticking to a plan, if at all one has
6.     Chasing the recent period winners
7.     Following stock price and not the company performance
8.     Relying on tips rather than research
Let us remember that a fund manager is also a human being and likely to fall prey to some of the mistakes on certain occasions. However, being a professional doing the job full time makes the fund manager understand these situations better. On top of this, the fund house would have its own investment guidelines and the fund manager is not allowed to venture outside these limits. These operating boundaries are: having an investment objective for the scheme, declaring the style of managing the portfolio upfront, announcing the asset allocation of the portfolio right in the beginning, the level of exposure to one stock or one sector, diversification, continuous monitoring of the performance of the companies and having full time research teams. Fund houses also have a risk management cell overlooking the performance of the fund managers. Such high level of safety ensures that the portfolio is not exposed to undue risks.
The fund houses have very stringent guidelines on the personal investments by the employees. SEBI also has certain regulations on this account. These put together ensure that the investors’ money is safe. This clearly separates mutual funds from almost all the investment options.
When we invest our money through mutual funds, we are assigning the job of managing money to someone known as a fund manager so that we can concentrate on our profession. The fund manager is involved in managing money full time or in other words; it is the full time profession of a fund manager to manage the investors’ money. If we think that we are good at what we do because we are professionals, the same is applicable to a fund manager also. Let us address an undue expectation that investors normally have from the fund managers. Many of us feel that when we have given our money to a fund manager, either the money must grow irrespective of the market conditions or at the least, the portfolio should outperform the benchmark index. Let us understand that while the fund manager and the team try their level best to achieve outperformance over benchmark index, like any other professional, they can only try and the result may not be in their hands. Many passengers have experienced uncomfortable landing even when the pilot is professionally trained, there are many flop movies given by the best of the actors and directors, many a great batsmen have got out for low scores and many patients have died on the operation table. The job of a fund manager is to identify good companies and invest the money in line with the scheme objective. There is always an attempt to outperform the benchmark index, but as we mentioned earlier in case of many other professions, the result may not be in their hands. However, this cannot be the reason for “Do-it-yourself” approach to investment as a failed operation does not make us do the surgery ourselves.
Amit Trivedi
The author runs Karmayog Knowledge Academy. The views expressed are his personal opinions.


Monday, September 8, 2014

What is the greatest safety feature in an investment?

Below is the link to my article in Mid-day Gujarati, Mumbai edition today:


The English translate is as under:


What is the greatest safety feature in an investment?
One of the most important safety features for any investor would be to be able to get timely information and the ability to out of the investment, if required. A mutual fund offers these two benefits – transparency and liquidity.
Let us look at some incidents to understand the point.
One fine morning in 2001, people of a particular city opened the newspaper to read about problems at a particular co-operative bank. Those who had deposits with this bank, immediately rushed to the nearest branch. The branch never opened. Here the information was available, but just a little late and the investors could not take any action.
Then, in the year 2009, a certain company reported to the stock exchanges that a large sum of money was missing in their bank accounts and the management had misrepresented the company’s accounts. The information was immediately flashed across the stock exchange terminals and the media. People rushed to sell the stocks they held, but the price went down by 90% in one trading session. The information was available in time, and people could act, too. But what did they get? The impact on the price was too much for the investor to feel any good about the transparency and liquidity.
What is the point in getting such information? Well, this is where mutual fund scores over all the other avenues.
The transparency that you get from mutual fund allows you to take a decision to invest in a particular scheme, monitor the progress of your investment, and periodically check if your investments are aligned to what you understand the scheme would do.
The question is, what happened to the share price of the company mentioned above – can that not happen in case of mutual funds? The good news is, “no, such a thing cannot happen to mutual funds.” Why? This is because an investor in a company is directly participating in the fortunes of the company. Hence, if the company performs well, the shareholder gains, but if the company fails, the shareholder loses. However, in case of a mutual fund, the investor hires the services of a professional fund manager. The failure of a fund manager would result in poor portfolio performance. However, the impact may not be as much as that of a poor manager can have on a company’s stock, since a mutual fund portfolio is diversified into many unrelated securities.
While bad judgment of the management may lead to collapse of the company, bad judgment of the fund manager would result into underperformance. Collapse of a company may mean total loss of investment, but scheme underperformance still allows the investor to get out of the scheme and get into something else. Since the scheme holds various investments, the exit of the investor would not impact the prices of the fund’s investments. And hence the 90% drop we discussed earlier will not happen in case of mutual fund scheme.
Consider this combination of transparency (availability of relevant information in time) and liquidity (ability to act on this information) before choosing your investments. You will find that no investment avenue comes anywhere close to mutual funds on this count.
-        Amit Trivedi
The author runs Karmayog Knowledge Academy. Views expressed here are his personal views.

                                                                                                             

Thursday, December 31, 2009

MF bashing

Recently, I came across an (actually, I should say “yet another”) article bashing mutual funds. I am in no mood to attack those who write articles bashing mutual funds, but it is important that certain things are clarified.

Mutual funds are very easy targets for bashing. It is easy to find faults with the various practices and performance numbers. Any day you open a financial newspaper or a financial website or the financial pages of a mainline newspaper, you see some story talking about problems with mutual funds. Ever wondered why people love to hate mutual funds or ever wondered why no other industry gets so much “hate reporting”?

Well, that is because of something that psychologists call “availability heuristics”. Availability heuristics means that people make judgments based on knowledge that is easily available. The availability of information is actually the biggest benefit mutual funds offer. No other investment option comes anywhere close mutual funds in terms of transparency.

We will take examples of three areas from where mutual funds get the maximum attack: insurance, stock broking and PMS (or portfolio management services).

Let us start with PMS or portfolio management services. This is quite similar to mutual funds as both employ professional managers to manage their investors’ money. Both can be called “managed accounts” while mutual funds are “pooled investments”, portfolio management services are “separately managed accounts”.
• Often PMS providers claim their ability to get out of markets before a crash. They cite examples of mutual funds whose NAVs fell.
o I would like to draw the attention of investors that NAV data for mutual funds is available to the world on a daily basis, which allows one to track the performance on a very regular basis. The data for PMS performance is only selectively available.
o In the absence of NAV data, even a savvy investor cannot check performance over various periods, risks in the portfolio, etc.
o The calculation of NAV happens as per SEBI guidelines, which is in line with ICAI guidelines.
• The fee structure of mutual funds is extremely transparent. SEBI has guidelines for the same and the structure is constant irrespective of who the investor is. That for PMS is negotiable and can be different for different investors.
• Mutual fund portfolios are available on a monthly basis (at least the top 10 holdings). The portfolio disclosure in case of PMS accounts is another dark alley. It is difficult for a prospective investor to take a decision without getting in touch with the PMS provider.

Broking firms keep talking about their superior ability to find the future winners, those multi-bagger stocks. Here again, the track record is either not available (on a daily basis) or it is available only selectively. The broker makes money when you do a transaction – either buy or sell. It is in the interest of the broker that you are excited to make a trade.

Ah, that brings us to PMS offered by brokers – they claim to be interested in your benefit but the portfolio does so many transactions that the broking division makes lots of money.

And finally, insurance industry – the less said the better. Most are negligent and do not know that they do not know. Yes, there are some stars, some good insurance advisors. But remember stars can be seen only during the night, when there is darkness all around. Ask a few questions and the agents have no answer. Even many insurance company executives have no answers to certain basic questions and then they hide behind the regulations.

The only request to all the MF-bashers is to come to the level of mutual funds in terms of transparency, flexibility, affordability. Jesus said, "Let he who is without sin cast the first stone."

Whenever I have raised this issue with some players, the reply has been that these are not regulatory requirements. Well, I believe transparency, ethics, customer-centricity are some things that need not wait for the regulator’s order.

Next time ask your stock broker how much money has the broking firm made through the buy-sell transactions you made in a year. Compare it with the money you have made (or lost). Ditto for the PMS provider. But in case of PMS, please ask for both the portfolio management fees as well as brokerage. Ask the insurance advisor to explain the “tables” in plain simple English – or whatever language you are comfortable with.
I request all the readers that whenever you come across a negative article about mutual funds, try to find similar information about the other investment options. The transparency of mutual funds is a great boon for the investors. Use it for your gains.

Finally, remember to also check if the writer has any axe to grind by writing against mutual funds.

From my side, let me make it clear that I make money by doing training programs for mutual fund companies and investment advisors. If someone wishes to consider that as my “interest” so be it. I am only suggesting that mutual funds have done it – let the others imitate.